Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 APRIL 2001

Open Forum For Anonymous Posters - Responding To Online Critics

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Michael Garvin
Michael Garvin

Using the internet, companies can reach prospective customers and investors around the world, vastly expanding the market for their goods and services. Just as easily, disgruntled employees, unhappy investors, dissatisfied customers and underhanded competitors can post damaging, defamatory remarks. What’s the best tactic for responding to online critics?

When criticisms made online (or in any other media) are false and injurious to a company’s reputation, the target may be entitled to sue the critic for defamation. In order to maintain a suit for defamation, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant "published" (i.e., communicated to a third party) a false statement of "fact" (as opposed to one of mere "opinion") that damaged the plaintiff’s reputation. When an online critic posts a statement that satisfies all of those criteria, he/she may be liable for resulting damage to the company’s profitability and goodwill.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from