Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2025

Numerous Appeals Challenge House Settlement

Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Contributor
Jackson Lewis P.C.

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.’s 950+ attorneys located in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Jackson Lewis P.C.

In the wake of the landmark June 6, 2025, House v. NCAA settlement, several groups have initiated appeals challenging the Settlement's terms, asserting Title IX, antitrust, and other related issues.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

In the wake of the landmark June 6, 2025, House v. NCAA settlement, several groups have initiated appeals challenging the Settlement's terms, asserting Title IX, antitrust, and other related issues.

Title IX and Antitrust Challenges
Three groups of female student-athletes appealed the district court-approved Settlement on grounds that the Settlement violates Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 to the Higher Education Act. Title IX forbids colleges and universities from excluding students from participating in programs, denying them benefits, or subjecting them to discrimination based on sex.

One group challenges the backpay damage calculations under the Settlement agreement as imbalanced, alleging that the calculated damages vastly favor male student-athletes over female student-athletes, in violation of the law.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from