Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 NOVEMBER 2013

No Expansion Of CFAA Liability For Monetary Exploit Of Software Bug

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

In the game Monopoly, lucky players landing on Community Chest might turn over the highly desirable "Bank Error in Your Favor, Collect $200″ card. By the next turn, the proceeds are usually invested in properties and houses, yet, some might wonder whether accepting such a windfall was proper in the first place…or could lead to criminal charges.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

In the game Monopoly, lucky players landing on Community Chest might turn over the highly desirable "Bank Error in Your Favor, Collect $200″ card.  By the next turn, the proceeds are usually invested in properties and houses, yet, some might wonder whether accepting such a windfall was proper in the first place...or could lead to criminal charges.

This concept was tested when police arrested two video poker players who were exploiting a software bug that allowed them to multiply jackpots with just a sequence of pushed buttons.  See United States v. Kane, No 11-mj-00001 (D. Nev. filed Jan. 19, 2011).  The defendants were charged with violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ("CFAA"), a federal statute that prohibits computer hacking and unauthorized access into computer networks.  The question was whether the defendants "exceeded authorized access" when they took advantage of an exploit in a video poker machine to win hundreds of thousands of dollars.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from