Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 NOVEMBER 2020

NAD Considers Context In Puffery Argument

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Stokely-Van Camp (or "SVC"), the makers of Gatorade, recently challenged claims made by BodyArmor about its SuperDrink and Lyte sports drinks, including banners with the following text...

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Stokely-Van Camp (or "SVC"), the makers of Gatorade, recently challenged claims made by BodyArmor about its SuperDrink and Lyte sports drinks, including banners with the following text:

  • The only sports drink. No artificial sweeteners, flavors, or dyes. Potassium packed electrolytes.
  • The only sports drink. Low calorie. No sugar added. No artificial sweeteners, flavors, or dyes.

SVC worried that consumers would view these claims as comparisons to Gatorade products. BodyArmor disagreed. It 1000302a.jpg argued that the first sentence - "the only sports drink" - was obvious puffery because no reasonable consumer would believe that BodyArmor is the only sports drink on the market. And it argued that the subsequent sentences were truthful monadic claims about its own products.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from