Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2024

Kattison Avenue | Issue 13

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

As the seasons change and autumn settles in, we are excited to welcome you to the Fall 2024 edition of Kattison Avenue. Inside this issue, you will find updates on recent court decisions...

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Advertising Law Insights From Madison Avenue and Beyond

Fall 2024 | Issue 13

Letter From the Editor

As the seasons change and autumn settles in, we are excited to welcome you to the Fall 2024 edition of Kattison Avenue. Inside this issue, you will find updates on recent court decisions regarding paid search advertising and related trademark infringement claims, and the latest directive targeting deceptive practices linked to subscriptions and memberships.

First, Litigation Partner and Deputy General Counsel David Halberstadter delves into the dispute between 1-800 Contacts, Inc. and JAND, Inc., which operates as Warby Parker, involving Warby Parker's use of keyword advertising tied to 1-800's trademarks. In his article, David explains why the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of 1-800's trademark infringement claims against Warby Parker and shares key takeaways from the decision for retailers and other advertisers that may find themselves on either side of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from