Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2017

Immunity For Internet Service Providers Under Siege?

Long ago in internet time, back in the mid-1990s, Congress considered how closely to regulate Internet Service Providers

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Long ago in internet time, back in the mid-1990s, Congress considered how closely to regulate Internet Service Providers (ISPs). Congress determined that it was in the best interests of the United States not to burden ISPs with restrictions, so that the Internet could grow and flourish in the areas of commerce, communications and education. Thus, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was enacted and it provides broad immunity for ISPs with respect to third-party content posted on their sites. Generally speaking, ISPs have not been saddled with publisher-type liability — it is not their job to police their web sites to ensure that posted content is not false or malicious.

The high water mark of Section 230 ISP immunity probably was best represented by the late-1990s case of Zeran v. AOL. In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals basically held that AOL did not have liability even though Zeran established that third-party content on the AOL site sought

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from