Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JULY 2003

Federal Circuit Clarifies the "Written Description" Requirement in Genetic Engineering Case

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

By Rivka Monheit and Patrea Pabst

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision that modifies and clarifies previous case law regarding the Patent Act’s written description and enablement requirements, making it significantly easier to obtain patents on genetically engineered materials. Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

The Enablement and Written Description Requirements

The enablement and written description requirements are found in 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, which states that the patent specification must contain "a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it…[such] as to enable any person of ordinary skill in the art to which it pertains … to make and use the same … " The enablement requirement is part of the fundamental trade-off struck by the Patent Act. In exchange for the grant of a patent, an inventor must

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from