Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 NOVEMBER 2011

ESI In The Criminal Context: A Call For Clarification

Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure set the stage for electronic discovery in civil cases, there is no such express regime in the criminal context.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure set the stage for electronic discovery in civil cases, there is no such express regime in the criminal context.

The absence of such a standard became evident in a recent case in the Western District of New York. In United States v. Briggs, 2011 WL 4017886 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2011), defendants were charged with several counts related to the distribution of cocaine. The criminal investigation leading to these charges involved court-authorized interceptions of cellular telephone communications indicating that the defendants were allegedly engaged in drug trafficking.

In its voluntary discovery, the Government furnished defense counsel with disks containing thousands of pages of documents relating to these communications using the IPRO program routinely used by the U.S. Attorney's Office in cases involving multiple defendants. Defendants claimed this reported data had problems with omissions and inaccuracies resulting from

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from