Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2020

U.S. Supreme Court: Excluding Religious Schools From A Scholarship Program Is Unconstitutional

In Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Montana could not exclude religious schools from a tax credit scholarship program...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Highlights

  • In Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Montana could not exclude religious schools from a tax credit scholarship program on the grounds that the state "no aid" or Blaine amendment required it.
  • The decision reiterates that disqualifying otherwise eligible recipients from a public benefit solely because of their religious character imposes a penalty on the free exercise of religion that requires the most exacting scrutiny.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court determined that Montana's constitutional interest in separating church and state more strictly than the Establishment Clause was not a compelling interest that could satisfy strict scrutiny in opposition to the Free Exercise Clause.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from