Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JANUARY 2012

The False Claims Act: 2011 Year-In-Review

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

The last few years have ushered in an unprecedented wave of activity by Congress, the Obama Administration, and the courts in the False Claims Act (FCA) arena. This renewed focus by all three branches of government means that companies doing business with the federal government must remain vigilant of these changes in order to avoid liability.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Article by David W. Ogden , Jonathan E. Paikin , Jennifer M. O'Connor , Todd R. Steggerda , Jonathan G. Cedarbaum , Carl J. Nichols , Christopher E. Babbitt , Boyd M. Johnson III , Robin L. Baker , Karen F. Green and Stephen A. Jonas

INTRODUCTION

The last few years have ushered in an unprecedented wave of activity by Congress, the Obama Administration, and the courts in the False Claims Act (FCA) arena. This renewed focus by all three branches of government means that companies doing business with the federal government must remain vigilant of these changes in order to avoid liability. The 2009 and 2010 amendments to the FCA are giving rise to new and expanded legal theories. The growing number of FCA cases means that courts will continue to have numerous opportunities to redraw the boundaries of the Act. And the Obama Administration has showed no signs of backing off from its aggressive enforcement of the Act, including its efforts

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from