Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2016

The Case For Publishing Justice Liu's Dissent

It turns out that Justice Goodwin Liu's statement dissenting from the denial of a petition for review two weeks ago wasn't the first one ever in California Supreme Court history, as we theorized at the time.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

It turns out that Justice Goodwin Liu's statement dissenting from the denial of a petition for review two weeks ago wasn't the first one ever in California Supreme Court history, as we theorized at the time. But, as far as we can tell, it's the first one in over 50 years. We have found five dissenting opinions from the denial of a hearing — now called review — from 1917 to 1958. (California did not have an intermediate appellate court until 1905.)

The question now is: how available will Justice Liu's dissent be? Possibly not very. According to a court spokesperson, under current practice, the dissent will be noted in the court's minutes, which appear in the official reports advance sheets but not in the bound volumes. It can also be viewed on the court's online docket for the case, In re Joseph H. But court minutes and online dockets are rather obscure and not conducive to computer searches. Also, the dissenting statement is not available on Westlaw, which means that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from