Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2017

TCPA Class Certified Based Largely On "Concrete Injury" Determination

Following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins – which held that Article III standing requires a concrete injury, even when an injury has otherwise been established for statutory purposes –

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1549 (2016) – which held that Article III standing requires a concrete injury, even when an injury has otherwise been established for statutory purposes – there has been a debate as to what constitutes Article III "concrete injury" under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227.

With certain exceptions, the TCPA creates a statutory cause of action for injunctions, damages, or both against persons or entities that initiate phone calls to residential telephone lines using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from