Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2014

Supreme Court To Decide CAFA Pleading Standard

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

On April 7th, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC v. Owens, a case originating from the Tenth Circuit.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On April 7th, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC v. Owens, a case originating from the Tenth Circuit. In that case, the Court will resolve a circuit split over the pleading standard applicable to determining CAFA removal jurisdiction. The question presented is:

Whether a defendant seeking removal to federal court is required to include evidence supporting federal jurisdiction in the notice of removal, or is alleging the required "short and plain statement of the grounds for removal" enough?

In Dart Cherokee, the lower courts held that the defendant did not satisfy its burden to establish removal jurisdiction under CAFA because, while it alleged the amount in controversy exceeded CAFA's $5 million dollar floor, it did not attach evidence to its notice of removal to support the allegation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from