Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2025

Supreme Court Limits Use Of Universal Injunctions

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

Three federal district courts held that the EO is likely unlawful and entered preliminary injunctions prohibiting executive officials from implementing the policy anywhere in the country.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the United States Supreme Court limited the ability of federal courts to issue injunctions granting nationwide relief against executive action. In a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, the Supreme Court in Trump v. Casa, Inc., held that universal injunctions – injunctions that prohibit state or federal actors from enforcing a law against individuals who are not parties to a lawsuit – likely exceed federal courts' congressionally authorized equitable authority.

The case arose from challenges to President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship (EO), which attempted to limit the circumstances in which US-born persons are recognized as American citizens. Several individuals, organizations, and states challenged the EO in federal court alleging, in relevant part, that the order violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 201 of the Nationality Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from