Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2008

Supreme Court Docket Report - June 23, 2008

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The confluence of the Sherman Act and the interconnection provisions of the Telecommunication Act of 1996 prompted the Supreme Court's decision in Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398 (2004).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 23, 2008

Keywords: Sherman Act, Verizon Communications, Trinko, Pacific Bell, linkLine Communications, AT&T California, antitrust telecommunications, price squeeze, monopolist, pregnancy discrimination, General Electric, Gilbert, Hulteen

The Supreme Court granted certiorari today in two cases of interest to the business community:

  • Antitrust/Telecommunications—Section 2 Price Squeeze Claims

  • Title VII—Pregnancy Discrimination Act—Treatment of Preenactment Leaves

Antitrust/Telecommunications—Section 2 Price Squeeze Claims

The confluence of the Sherman Act and the interconnection provisions of the Telecommunication Act of 1996 prompted the Supreme Court's decision in Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398 (2004). In Trinko, the Court held that a plaintiff did

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from