Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JANUARY 2016

Supreme Court Docket Report - January 15, 2016

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in four cases of interest to the business community: Patent Act—Inter Partes Review of Patent Validity; Class Actions—Appellate Jurisdiction to Review Denial of Class Certification After Stipulated Dismissal; Copyright Act—Availability of Attorney's Fees to a Prevailing Party; Fair Labor Standards Act—Overtime Pay for "Service Advisors" at Car Dealerships

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in four cases of interest to the business community:

Patent Act—Inter Partes Review of Patent Validity

Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, No. 15-446

In 2011, Congress enacted the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, which created a new adjudicatory process for challenges to the validity of patents. Under the new process, a person other than the patent owner may petition the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the Patent Trademark Office (the Board) to review the validity of a patent by instituting an adversarial proceeding known as "in partes review" (IPR). 35 U.S.C. §§ 311–314. The statute provides that the Board's decision whether to institute IPR "shall be final and nonappealable." Id. § 314(d). In Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, No. 15-446, the Supreme Court granted review to consider two important questions concerning the IPR process. First, the Court will consider whether the Board's decision to institute IPR is

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from