Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2009

Supreme Court Docket Report - Decision Alert - April 1, 2009

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

In “Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.”, 415 U.S. 36 (1974), the Supreme Court allowed a discharged employee to bring an employment-discrimination claim in federal court even though he had already engaged in arbitration of the claim under his union’s collective bargaining agreement.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published April 1, 2009

Keywords: Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co, employment-discrimination claim, collective-bargaining agreement, CBA, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, ADEA, Pyett, National Labor Relations Act, NLRA, employment contract, Clean Water Act, powerplants, EPA

Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, No.07-581 (previously discussed in February 19, 2008 Docket Report)

In Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36 (1974), the Supreme Court allowed a discharged employee to bring an employment-discrimination claim in federal court even though he had already engaged in arbitration of the claim under his union's collective bargaining agreement. In the years that followed, some courts construed Gardner-Denver and subsequent cases to preclude a union from agreeing, through a collective-bargaining agreement on behalf of its members, that the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from