Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2013

Supreme Court Docket Report - December 6, 2013

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Section 101 of the Patent Act provides that "[w]hoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title."

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today (December 6, 2013), the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community:


Patent Act—Patent Eligibility of Computer-Implemented Inventions

Section 101 of the Patent Act provides that "[w]hoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title." 35 U.S.C. § 101. Laws of nature, physical phenomena, and abstract ideas, however, are exempt from this provision; the Supreme Court has long held that granting such a patent monopoly would improperly preempt the use of these fundamental principles. Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, No. 13-298, to consider whether certain patent claims that are implemented through the use of a computer are eligible for patent protection.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from