Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2017

Supreme Court Decision Alert - May 22, 2017

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.


Patent Act—Venue

TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Group LLC, No. 16-341

The patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), permits a patent infringement action to be brought "in the judicial district where the defendant resides."  Although the Supreme Court held in 1957 that § 1400(b) was exclusive and that a corporate defendant "resides," for these purposes, only where it is incorporated, the Federal Circuit held in 1990 that amendments to the general venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391, had changed the venue calculus in patent cases.  The Federal Circuit's approach provided plaintiffs with far greater flexibility in selecting a venue, which resulted in a disproportionate share of patent infringement actions being filed in judicial districts (like the U.S. District Court for

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from