Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2012

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 26, 2012

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 allows shareholder derivative lawsuits against statutorily defined "insiders" who have profited from "short-swing" transactions. In addition to defining a short-swing transaction as a coupled purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, completed within six months, the statute provides that "no such suit shall be brought more than two years after the date such profit was realized."

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published March 26, 2012

Today the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Securities Law—Section 16(b)—Statute of Limitations

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds, No. 10-1261 (previously discussed in the June 27, 2011 Docket Report).

Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 allows shareholder derivative lawsuits against statutorily defined "insiders" who have profited from "short-swing" transactions. In addition to defining a short-swing transaction as a coupled purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, completed within six months, the statute provides that "no such suit shall be brought more than two years after the date such profit was realized." 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b). To facilitate the identification of improper trades, Section 16(a) requires insiders to report to the SEC transactions involving relevant securities. Today, in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds, No

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from