Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MARCH 2011

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 1, 2011

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA"), 38 U.S.C. § 4311 et seq., it is unlawful for an employer to discriminate on the basis of an employee’s membership in the armed services.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published March 1, 2011

Keywords: USERRA, reemployment rights, antimilitary bias acts, freedom of information act, FOIA, enforcement action

Today the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

  • Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act—Imputed Bias
  • Freedom of Information Act—Corporations

Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act—Imputed Bias

Staub v. Proctor Hospital,No. 09-400 (previously discussed in the April 19, 2010 Docket Report).

Under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA"), 38 U.S.C. § 4311 et seq., it is unlawful for an employer to discriminate on the basis of an employee's membership in the armed services. Today, in Staub v. Proctor Hospital, No. 09-400, the Supreme Court held that an employer is liable under USERRA when a supervisor animated by antimilitary bias acts with the intent to cause an adverse

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from