Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2009

Supreme Court Decision Alert - June 8, 2009

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

In certain circumstances, the Due Process Clause prohibits a judge from sitting in a case. Today, the Supreme Court extended its constitutional recusal rule to judicial elections and possibly beyond.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 8, 2009

Keywords: Supreme Court, Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Due Process Clause,  judicial elections, Supreme Court of Appeals, Justice Benjamin, risk of actual bias, United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York, notice of appeal, qui tam

Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., No 08-22 (previously discussed in the November 17, 2008 Docket Report)

In certain circumstances, the Due Process Clause prohibits a judge from sitting in a case.  Today, the Supreme Court extended its constitutional recusal rule to judicial elections and possibly beyond. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from