Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JUNE 2011

Supreme Court Decision Alert - June 6, 2011

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

SEC Rule 10b-5, which implements Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, makes it unlawful for any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of a security, "[t]o make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading." 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5(b).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 6, 2011

Keywords: Securities Exchange Act, class certification, loss causation, Bayh-Dole Act, patent rights

Today the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

Securities Exchange Act of 1934—Class Certification—Loss Causation

Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403 (previously discussed in the January 10, 2011 Docket Report)

SEC Rule 10b-5, which implements Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, makes it unlawful for any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of a security, "[t]o make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading." 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5(b). A private right of action to enforce Rule 10b-5 has been judicially inferred. The elements of the claim include (1) the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from