Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2013

Supreme Court Decision Alert - June 25, 2013

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The Supreme Court has recently issued one decision, described below, which is of interest to the business community.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Keywords: Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, land-use permit, wetlands, regulatory taking, Nollan-Dolan standard,

Today the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

  • Takings—Whether Government May Deny Permits Based on Property Owner's Refusal to Pay for Unrelated Improvements

Takings—Whether Government May Deny Permits Based on Property Owner's Refusal to Pay for Unrelated Improvements

Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, No. 11-1447 (previously discussed in the October 8, 2012, Docket Report)

Today, in a 5-4 decision in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, No. 11-1447, the Supreme Court clarified its holdings in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), which prohibit the government from conditioning the approval of a land-use permit on an owner's relinquishment of a portion of his

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from