Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2013

Supreme Court Decision Alert - June 17, 2013

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (i.e., the Hatch-Waxman Act), a generic-drug manufacturer may obtain FDA approval to market and sell a generic version of a patent-protected drug by certifying that the patent is invalid or unenforceable.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Keywords: patent infringement, generic drugs, driver's privacy protection act

Patent-Infringement Suits - Generic Drugs - Reverse-Payment Settlement Agreements

Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., No. 12-416 (previously discussed in the December 10, 2012, Docket Report)

Under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (i.e., the Hatch-Waxman Act), a generic-drug manufacturer may obtain FDA approval to market and sell a generic version of a patent-protected drug by certifying that the patent is invalid or unenforceable. 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV). The patent holder may then initiate a patent-infringement suit against the generic-drug manufacturer, in what is known as "Paragraph IV litigation." FTC v. Actavis, Inc. , arose from the settlement of one such lawsuit. Under a 2006 settlement agreement, the patent holder, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, and the generic-drug manufacturers, Watson Pharmaceuticals and Paddock Laboratories, entered into

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from