Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2016

Spokeo's Impact On Eleventh Circuit FDCPA Case

The Eleventh Circuit recently released an unpublished decision regarding its opinion on the impact of Spokeo on a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act putative class action, finding that the named plaintiff satisfied Article III standing requirement.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Eleventh Circuit recently released an unpublished decision regarding its opinion on the impact of Spokeo on a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act putative class action, finding that the named plaintiff satisfied Article III standing requirement.

In Church v. Accretive Health, Inc., the defendant sent the named plaintiff a letter advising her that she owed a hospital debt.  The letter allegedly did not include certain disclosures required by the FDCPA.  The plaintiff claimed that upon receiving the letter in question, she "was very angry" and "cried a lot."  Plaintiff filed suit in Alabama federal court.  The district court originally granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, holding that the defendant was not a "debt collector" under the Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from