Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2016

Sokenu Authors Article On Constitutionality Of SEC Administrative Proceedings

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The SEC's selective use of administrative proceedings (AP) for some, but not all, litigated enforcement actions has been the subject of significant public criticism in recent years.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Previously published in New York Law Journal on September 6.

The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) selective use of administrative proceedings (AP) for some, but not all, litigated enforcement actions has been the subject of significant public criticism in recent years. Respondents have brought numerous challenges to the SEC's use of APs arguing that the SEC's selective use of the proceedings is inherently unfair. Respondents achieved a measure of success in 2015 by challenging APs on the ground that administrative law judges (ALJs) were not properly appointed pursuant to the Appointments Clause of Article II of the Constitution and, thus, could not issue decisions in APs.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from