Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MARCH 2014

Severance Under Rule 21 May Defeat CAFA Jurisdiction

When an action is severed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, the severed action must have an independent jurisdictional basis to remain in federal court.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

State of Louisiana v. American National Property And Casualty Company , 2013 WL 5201146 (E.D. La. Sept. 11, 2013).

In this case, the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana held that, while subject matter jurisdiction is generally determined at the onset of litigation, when an action is severed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, the severed action must have an independent jurisdictional basis to remain in federal court.

Procedural History

In Louisiana v. AAA Insurance, Case No. 07-5528 (the "Road Home Litigation"), the State of Louisiana (the "State"), brought an action in state court to recover funds from over 200 insurers.  Recipients of Road Home grants had assigned the disputed funds to the State pursuant to subrogation agreements with the recipients' insurers.  In the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the State, with funding from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, created The Road Home program to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from