Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JULY 2017

Seventh Circuit Rejects Latest Attempt To Pick Off TCPA Plaintiffs

With the Rule 68 offer approach shut down by Campbell-Ewald, defendants sought new ways to shut down TCPA litigation prior to class certification.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Defense counsel facing potential multimillion-dollar judgments from the threat of class action proceedings—particularly class actions brought under statutes providing for treble damages and attorney's fees, such as the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) —have gotten creative in their attempts to end class litigation before certification. For example, in Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez, 136 S. Ct. 663 (2016), the Supreme Court considered whether an unaccepted offer to satisfy the named plaintiff's individual TCPA claim, made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, renders the plaintiff's (and the purported class') case moot. The Court held that it did not, reasoning that under basic principles of contract law, an unaccepted offer is a legal nullity, did not bind either party, and therefore did not moot the parties' dispute. Id. at 670. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from