Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2008

Seventh Circuit Bars Rescission Class Actions In TILA Cases

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

On September 24, 2008, the Seventh Circuit held that rescission of a mortgage – one of the remedies available under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) – may not be awarded to an entire class of borrowers.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Article by Jeffrey Sarles , Scott A. Anenberg , Jeffrey P. Taft and Lucia Nale

Originally published September 25, 2008

Keywords: Seventh Circuit, class actions, Truth in Lending Act, TILA, Andrews, Chevy Chase Bank, mortgage lenders, assignees, mortgages

On September 24, 2008, the Seventh Circuit held that rescission of a mortgage – one of the remedies available under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) – may not be awarded to an entire class of borrowers. In Andrews v. Chevy Chase Bank, No. 07-1326 (7th Cir. Sept. 24, 2008), the court vacated the district court's certification of such a class, holding "as a matter of law that a class action for the rescission remedy under TILA may not be maintained." Mayer Brown represented the lender on this appeal.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from