Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2024

Second Circuit Limits U.S.-Based Discovery For ICSID Arbitrations

Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP
Contributor
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP

Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP

Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, founded in 1830, was one of the first US law firms to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP

On July 19, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York ruled that an arbitral tribunal formed under the auspices of the International Centre...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On July 19, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York ruled that an arbitral tribunal formed under the auspices of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is not a “foreign or international tribunal” under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, a federal law that allows discovery from persons residing or found in the United States in aid of foreign proceedings.1 This decision limits access to U.S. discovery tools to obtain information for use in ICSID arbitrations.

An Italian investment company, Webuild S.P.A., initiated an ICSID arbitration against the Republic of Panama under the Panama-Italy Bilateral Investment Treaty arising out of a contract for the expansion of the Panama Canal.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from