Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 NOVEMBER 2017

Second Circ. Holds Arbitration Provision In Uber App's Terms Of Service Created Valid Agreement To Arbitrate

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

The article examines the Second Circuit's holding that the arbitration provision within Uber's terms of service as presented in Uber's app interface resulted in a valid agreement to arbitrate.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Litigation counsel Michael S. Oberman's article, "Second Circ. Holds Arbitration Provision in Uber App's Terms of Service Created Valid Agreement to Arbitrate," appeared in the Aug. 21, 2017 issue of The CPR Institute's blog CPR Speaks. The article examines the Second Circuit's holding that the arbitration provision within Uber's terms of service as presented in Uber's app interface resulted in a valid agreement to arbitrate.

Originally published in August 2017

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from