Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2025

PFAS Out, Libel In: Testing The Boundaries Of Defamation And Tortious Interference

Dechert
Dechert
Contributor
Dechert

Dechert

Dechert helps business leaders lead For more than 150 years, we’ve advised the innovators who move...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dechert

A manufacturer of PFAS free turf has filed a defamation suit to prevent an environmental group from harming its business after the group issued blanket statements about the presence of PFAS.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A manufacturer of PFAS free turf has filed a defamation suit to prevent an environmental group from harming its business after the group issued blanket statements about the presence of PFAS in turf that ignored innovations in the industry. If successful, this case may allow companies with innovative products to pursue recourse against misleading statements.

In a recent complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern Division, plaintiff Polyloom Corporation of America d/b/a TenCate Grass North America, Inc. ("Polyloom") alleges that defendant Grassroots Environmental Education ("GEE") and others engaged in defamation and tortious interference with Polyloom's business relations by asserting that PFAS can be found in "most artificial turf fields" and poses health risks. Compl., Polyloom Corp. America v. Grassroots Envtl. Educ., inc. et. al., No. 25 cv 00014 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 20, 2025). Polyloom makes and sells artificial turf

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from