Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2014

NLRB Refuses To Yield On Anti-Arbitration Ruling Despite Near-Unanimous Rejection By Courts

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Today is Halloween, an occasion when our thoughts turn to jack o'lanterns, ghosts, and zombies. We are particularly fascinated by zombies—the dead returned to life.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today is Halloween, an occasion when our thoughts turn to jack o'lanterns, ghosts, and zombies. We are particularly fascinated by zombies—the dead returned to life. But we're not the only ones. In a decision earlier this week, a majority of the National Labor Relations Board voted to reanimate the dead.

The Board's zombie of choice?  Its decision nearly three years ago in D.R. Horton (pdf), in which the Board sought to push back on arbitration agreements that require individual arbitration rather than class or collective actions.  As our readers know by now, most courts have accepted the Supreme Court's clear and emphatic message that the Federal Arbitration Act protects the right of contracting parties to agree to resolve any disputes through arbitration on an individual basis.  But the NLRB, which hears complaints alleging unfair labor practices, came to a different conclusion in D.R. Horton, concluding that individual arbitration interferes with the right of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from