Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 SEPTEMBER 2024

Next Stop, SCOTUS?: Preemption Holding Creates Circuit Split Over Pesticide Labeling

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

The recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Schaffner v. Monsanto Corp., No. 22-3075, 2024 WL 3820973 (3d Cir. Aug. 16, 2024), creates a clear circuit split on an important question...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Schaffner v. Monsanto Corp., No. 22-3075, 2024 WL 3820973 (3d Cir. Aug. 16, 2024), creates a clear circuit split on an important question of express preemption under the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). An ideologically diverse Third Circuit panel unanimously held that federal law preempts claims that Monsanto is liable under Pennsylvania law for failing to give a cancer warning on its glyphosate-based weed killer, Roundup, because the EPA had registered and approved the product's label under FIFRA without requiring such a warning. Such claims, the Third Circuit held, were expressly preempted by FIFRA's "Uniformity" provision, 7 U.S.C. § 136v(b).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from