Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2013

New York Taps The Brakes On Foreign Judgment Collection

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda,greatly broadened the judgment enforcement power of New York courts, a decision of note especially for global financial institutions with customer assets in faraway places.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Four years ago, the New York Court of Appeals, in Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda,1 greatly broadened the judgment enforcement power of New York courts, a decision of note especially for global financial institutions with customer assets in faraway places. This split decision by the state's highest court accorded judgment creditors worldwide the long arm of New York's new enforcement law, enabling them to reach far beyond New York's borders to grab debtors' assets. But what if the underlying litigation, the parties themselves, and the targeted assets bear no connection to New York? It does not matter.

Although the court recently shortened, somewhat, the long arms bestowed by Koehler, the far-reaching implications of these two decisions on international enterprises—especially financial institutions—subject to jurisdiction in New York (and their business counterparties) command attention. Ignorance of the evolving jurisprudence might prove expensive.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from