Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 SEPTEMBER 2020

Maryland Drifts Into Daubert

That's how Maryland's highest court chose to characterize its gradual move from Frye to Daubert – a drifting process.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

That's how Maryland's highest court chose to characterize its gradual move from Frye to Daubert - a drifting process. Like the way the ocean drifts ashore as the tide is rising. Creeping a little higher, each wave covering and absorbing a little more of the beach. As it slowly inches toward your chair where you're trying to finish the latest Erin Hildebrand summer must read. Maybe it picks up a few new shells along the way, but it takes its sweet time reaching its crest. Or, maybe we're just lamenting the end of summer. Either way, we are happy to report that Maryland's slow drift finally ended - it adopted Daubert.

In Rockhind v. Stevenson, 2020 WL 5085877 (Md. Ct. App.), Maryland's highest court, in a 4-3 decision, acknowledged that it was now joining the "supermajority" of states to adopt the federal Daubert standard. Id. at *2. So, where does that leave us in the tally? By our count, 42 states (including the District of Columbia) have adopted Daubert. Five

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

See more popular content from