Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2020

Mandatory Arbitration Provision Struck Down By The Washington Supreme Court

The Washington Supreme Court refused to enforce a mandatory arbitration agreement that was contained within an Employee Handbook.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Washington Supreme Court refused to enforce a mandatory arbitration agreement that was contained within an Employee Handbook. Because it was not a separately signed agreement, the Court held that the employee had no opportunity to review it prior to employment and thus never agreed to arbitration. The Court also ruled the agreement was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.

In Burnett v. Pagliacci Pizza, Inc., the Washington Supreme Court held that a pizza delivery driver was not required to arbitrate his wage and hour claims.  Burnett (the named plaintiff in a putative class action lawsuit) did not have notice of the arbitration provision when he signed his employment agreement with Pagliacci Pizza, Inc., because the arbitration agreement was included in a separate employment handbook.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from