Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2026

Litigation Minute: Generative AI Data, Attorney-Client Privilege, And The Work-Product Doctrine

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

As generative AI (GenAI) tools become embedded in legal and business workflows, courts are grappling with questions regarding how attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine apply to GenAI data...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

What You Need to Know in a Minute or Less

As generative AI (GenAI) tools become embedded in legal and business workflows, courts are grappling with questions regarding how attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine apply to GenAI data, including prompts, outputs, and activity logs. While recent decisions confirm that GenAI data may constitute discoverable electronically stored information (ESI) (discussed in a previous Litigation Minute), a separate and equally important question is when those materials may be protected from disclosure.

Recent case law makes it clear that courts will apply traditional privilege and work-product principles to this new category of ESI. Whether a privilege or protection applies will turn on how, why, by whom, and under what conditions GenAI tools are used.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from