Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2014

Law, Facts, & Hostile Judges

As it turns out, Chicago poet and journalist Carl Sandburg is one of--if not the--first person to be credited with an old piece of advice for lawyers

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

 As it turns out, Chicago poet and journalist Carl Sandburg is one of--if not the--first person to be credited with an old piece of advice for lawyers:

If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.

As well as sourcing Sandburg's quote, in his article for the journal American Politics Research, Law, Fact, and the Threat of Reversal From Above, University of Alabama professor Joseph L. Smith uses the latest in computer content analysis (basically, the use of algorithms to categorize writing based on important recurring terms) to examine administrative law opinions from 1925-2002 to test that advice. More specifically, Professor Smith tested whether judges felt more constrained by the facts of a case or the legal standard governing it. His conclusion:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from