Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2025

Labcorp v. Davis: Will U.S. Supreme Court Resolve Circuit Split Over Article III Standing?

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Labcorp v. Davis (No. 24-304), a case that arrived at the Court to resolve a fundamental question: "[w]hether a federal court may certify a class...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Highlights

  • The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case Labcorp v. Davis, where visually impaired patients took legal action against Labcorp after its implementation of self-service check-in kiosks.
  • The argument revealed skepticism on the Supreme Court, as the justices displayed little appetite for addressing whether Article III standing should be required for all class members at the class certification stage.
  • This Holland & Knight alert details the views and questions asked by individual Supreme Court justices.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Labcorp v. Davis (No. 24-304), a case that arrived at the Court to resolve a fundamental question: "[w]hether a federal court may certify a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) when some members of the proposed class lack any Article III injury." In this case, visually impaired patients initiated legal action against Labcorp following the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from