Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2014

Justices Probe Limits Of Non-Delegation Doctrine And Express Due Process Concerns

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Dep't of Transp. v. Ass'n of Am. Railroads.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Jerrold J. Ganzfried is a Partner and Jameson B. Rice an Associate in our Washington D.C. office

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Dep't of Transp. v. Ass'n of Am. Railroads. At issue is whether Congress may grant Amtrak, a private entity created by Congress, the power to co-author regulations governing, and appoint an arbitrator for disputes concerning, private freight railroads, as instructed by § 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment Improvement Act without violating the non-delegation doctrine or due process clause.

During oral argument, counsel for the Department of Transportation argued that the metrics and standards developed pursuant to the statute are not regulatory and that instead any "regulatory effect" comes from the long-standing statutory preference requirement enacted by Congress rather than Amtrak. Counsel for the Association of American Railroads responded that to impose liability on the freight railroads,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from