Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2011

Judge Issues Opinion on Definition of "Foreign Official"

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

In three recent cases, defendants prosecuted under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") challenged their indictments using a similar argument – employees of state-owned entities do not fall within the definition of "foreign official" under the FCPA.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In three recent cases, defendants prosecuted under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") challenged their indictments using a similar argument – employees of state-owned entities do not fall within the definition of "foreign official" under the FCPA. United States v. O'Shea, No. 4:09-cr-00629 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 2011); United States v. Noriega, No. 2:10-cr-01031-AHM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2011) (hereinafter "Lindsey Manufacturing"); United States v. Carson, No. 8:09-cr-00077-JVS (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2011). To violate the FCPA, a corrupt payment must be directed to a "foreign official." The FCPA defines "foreign official" as:

any officer or employee of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, or of a public international organization, or any person acting in an official capacity for or on behalf of any such government or department, agency, or instrumentality, or for or on behalf of any such public international organization.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from