Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2020

Internet Terms And Conditions: Second Circuit Declines To Enforce Arbitration Agreement Accessible Through Browsewrap Hyperlink

We have recently written about the challenges involved in enforcing "browsewrap" contracts. See Internet terms of use: Ninth Circuit enforces arbitration agreement accessible through browsewrap

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Takeaway:  We have recently written about the challenges involved in enforcing "browsewrap" contracts.  See Internet terms of use: Ninth Circuit enforces arbitration agreement accessible through browsewrap hyperlink (August 31, 2020).  The Second Circuit recently addressed this issue in declining to enforce browsewrap terms and conditions containing an arbitration agreement.  The decisions in this area show that a hyperlink must be reasonably conspicuous to put a consumer on the requisite inquiry notice to render terms and conditions enforceable.

In Arnaud v. Doctor's Associates Inc., ___ F. App'x ___, No. 19-3057-cv, 2020 WL 5523507, at *1 (2d Cir. Sept. 15, 2020), Luis Arnaud entered his phone number on a promotional page of Subway's website and clicked a box labeled "I'M IN" to receive a free Subway sandwich the next time he purchased a 32-ounce drink.  The promotional page included a hyperlink to terms and conditions that included an arbitration agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from