Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 SEPTEMBER 2015

"Human Intervention" Defense To TCPA Gains Traction

We will continue to watch these cases in hopes of seeing a larger trend develop that could afford defendants in other jurisdictions a similar line of defense.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On August 26, 2015, we wrote about a decision out of the Northern District of California, Luna v. Shac, LLC, Case No. 5:14-cv-00607-HRL, 2015 WL 4941781 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2015), in which the defendant prevailed in defeating a TCPA class action using a "human intervention" based defense. Now, just two weeks later, another defendant in the district has prevailed on similar grounds. This may be a sign that this defense, bolstered by the FCC's July 10, 2015 declaratory ruling, may be picking up steam.

In McKenna v. WhisperText, the plaintiff claimed a text message he received containing an anonymous invitation from a WhisperText user to join the platform violated the TCPA. No. 5:14-cv-00424-PSG, 2015 WL 5264750 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2015). The Court dismissed McKenna's first amended complaint for failing to allege the WhisperText app used an ATDS to send the texts. McKenna's next complaint made clear that the platform could only send these texts at the affirmative

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from