Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2026

FCA Liability For Direct Endorsement Lenders

A Ninth Circuit case demonstrates how private litigants can pursue False Claims Act violations against mortgage lenders even when the federal government declines to intervene or seeks dismissal.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Ninth Circuit case United States ex rel. Thrower v. Academy Mortgage Corp. provides mortgage lenders, servicers, and other entities submitting claims for payment to the federal government an important reminder of how private litigants create potential liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), even when the government shows little initiative to proceed (or, in this case, even moves to dismiss).

In 2016, Gwen Thrower sued her former employer, Academy Mortgage Corporation, alleging violations of the FCA related to Academy’s compliance with the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) Direct Endorsement Program. Thrower’s complaint alleges that Academy effectively created a sham underwriting process for its FHA-insured loans, allowing loans to be approved that did not comply with FHA rules. For example, the complaint alleges Academy implemented “tactics such as miscalculating or misrepresenting borrower’s income or debt obligations, ignoring clear warning signs of fraud, and hiding

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from