Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2019

Discovery Battles In AbbVie v. Boehringer Ingelheim

The many discovery disputes between AbbVie and Boehringer Ingelheim over BI's biosimilar of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) in the Delaware District Court are providing insight on the bounds of discovery in BPCIA litigation.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The many discovery disputes between AbbVie and Boehringer Ingelheim ("BI") over BI's biosimilar of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) in the Delaware District Court are providing insight on the bounds of discovery in Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCIA") litigation. Below, we discuss some of the key discovery motions and rulings in AbbVie v. Boehringer (1:17-cv-01065, D. Del.) and illustrate how they provide guidance to other BPCIA litigants.

I. BI's Discovery Efforts

Over the past several months, BI has filed at least six motions to compel production of a broad range of documents, in addition to motions to enforce discovery orders. Despite AbbVie's resistance, BI has succeeded, at least in part, in obtaining such discovery.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from