Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2024

CPLR 5704 Is A Powerful, But Poorly-Defined, Tool That Highlights Department Differences

Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Contributor
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Seyfarth Shaw LLP

CPLR Section 5704 ("Review of ex parte orders") provides an avenue for Appellate Division review of such a refusal to sign an order to show cause. Unfortunately, however...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Imagine that you bring a motion in New York Supreme Court, and you do so by order to show cause, but the judge refuses to sign the order to show cause, leaving the motion in limbo. The judge's refusal to sign is not appealable under New York law; there is no decision or order to appeal from. What options do you have? Ostensibly, CPLR Section 5704 ("Review of ex parte orders") provides an avenue for Appellate Division review of such a refusal to sign an order to show cause. Unfortunately, however, New York courts have yet to provide clear guidance on when such applications will or will not be granted. How CPLR Section 5704 applications are presently handled also highlights significant procedural differences between the Appellate Division Departments that linger despite the introduction of the uniform Practice Rules of the Appellate Division in 2018. The lower courts and litigants would be well served by the Departments adopting clear, uniform substantive and procedural

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from