Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 DECEMBER 2017

Can Juries Decide Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101?

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

An article by Partner Greg Lantier and former Senior Associate Richard Crudo, published by the Federal Circuit Bar Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

An article by Partner Greg Lantier and former Senior Associate Richard Crudo, published by the Federal Circuit Bar Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1. This article first outlines the substantive law surrounding § 101 and addresses procedural issues that are relevant for determining whether juries ought to hear § 101 challenges, next engages in a historical analysis and examines whether a Seventh Amendment jury trial right attaches to § 101 challenges, and finally addresses policy considerations that bear on the issue.

Excerpt: No provision of the Patent Act has been more frequently litigated over the last several years than 35 U.S.C. § 101. After not having decided a § 101 case in nearly a decade, the Supreme Court issued four § 101 decisions in as many years, most recently articulating a test for determining whether computer system claims are patent eligible in its 2014 Alice Corp. Pty. v. CLS Bank International decision. Since then, the Federal Circuit has decided more than

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from