Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2023

A Dive Into Third-Party Litigation Financing And Third-Party Medical Funding

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

A few years ago, commentators estimated there was $5 billion in litigation financing in the United States.[2] Since then, the litigation funding industry has continued to grow.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

1 A few years ago, commentators estimated there was $5 billion in litigation financing in the United States.2 Since then, the litigation funding industry has continued to grow. For good reason, Third-Party Litigation Financing ("TPLF") and its offshoot, Third-Party Medical Funding ("TPMF"), are hot topics in litigation. They are issues for defendants in a variety of types of litigation, including product liability disputes.

These two financial mechanisms are largely unrelated. In traditional TPLF arrangements, an investor advances money to a party—usually a plaintiff—to pay lawsuit expenses. In exchange, plaintiff agrees to give the investor a portion of his proceeds from the litigation. Traditionally, these are nonrecourse investments, in which the funder is guaranteed a portion of any awarded damages, including fees, judgments, or settlements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from